At large US companies, the chief executive now typically earns on the order of two hundred times the median employee — and the ratio's real information isn't the outrage number, it's the composition. Since 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission has required public companies to disclose CEO pay as a multiple of median worker pay, and across the S&P 500 the multiple has generally run between roughly 170 and 300 depending on the year and methodology. The stock portion, not the salary, drives nearly all of it. That's why the number swings with markets while the debate stays stuck on cash.
Amjilt News publishes information, not investment advice.
What does the rule actually require?
Under the Dodd-Frank mandate the SEC implemented in 2018, each public company reports total CEO compensation — salary, bonus, long-term incentives, the grant-date value of equity awards — divided by the median annual total compensation of all employees, excluding the CEO. Companies get methodological latitude: they may use statistical sampling to find the median employee, may exclude non-US employees in limited cases, and may annualize part-timers. That latitude is why identical-looking ratios between two companies can rest on different math. Reading the footnote is not pedantry; it's the only way to compare.
Why does equity dominate the number?
Because at the top of the market, it does. For S&P 500 chief executives, stock and option grants have typically made up well over half of reported total compensation, per the proxy analyses published annually by compensation research firms such as Equilar and by the AFL-CIO's executive paywatch database. A CEO with a $1.5 million salary and a $40 million equity grant has a ratio driven almost entirely by the grant's date-of-award value — which will later prove to be worth more or less than that, depending on performance and the stock. Median employees, by contrast, are paid mostly in cash. The ratio compares a market bet against a paycheck.
What does the ratio correlate with?
Industry, mostly — and this is where the number gets misused. Companies with large part-time or international workforces, common in retail and food service, post ratios several times higher than software firms with smaller, better-paid staffs. A high ratio can mean aggressive executive pay, a low-wage workforce, or simply a business model with thousands of entry-level roles. Researchers and the SEC's own adopting release have cautioned against cross-industry comparison for exactly this reason. The honest use is longitudinal: is this company's ratio changing, and why.
Do investors do anything with it?
A little, and more each cycle. Some institutional investors cite widening ratios and missing median-employee wage growth in say-on-pay votes — several large asset managers' voting policies name internal pay equity as a factor they weigh, and say-on-pay opposition in the 20-to-40 percent range has appeared at individual companies in recent years without becoming typical. Labor funds use the disclosure in campaigns. But the binding constraint on executive pay remains the compensation committee and the peer benchmarking consultants, and the ratio functions there as a reputational guardrail rather than a cap.
What changed in the 2026 reporting season?
The pay-ratio disclosures arriving with the 2026 proxy season reflect 2025 compensation — a year in which equity markets rewarded technology and AI-adjacent companies disproportionately, so expect the ratios at those firms to widen again even where cash pay was flat. Watch two footnotes in particular: whether the company changed its median-employee methodology, and how pension values and one-time awards moved the numerator. Both can shift the ratio double-digit percentage points with no change in anyone's actual experience of pay.
FAQ
What is the average CEO-to-worker pay ratio?
Across the S&P 500 the ratio has generally run in the 170-to-300 range since disclosure began in 2018, varying with equity markets and methodology. Cross-industry comparisons are unreliable because staffing structure moves the denominator.
Does a high ratio mean anything is wrong?
Not by itself. It can reflect equity-heavy CEO pay, a large entry-level workforce, or industry norms. The informative signals are the trend over time and the footnotes on methodology.
For more context, read Buybacks and dividends stayed huge — and stopped being the scandal.
For more context, read middle market m&a 2026.
For more context, read family office investing.