Employee resource groups spent 2023-2025 being asked to do more with less — and discovering, painfully, that they never had a job description in the first place. As corporate DEI programs contracted following the 2023 Supreme Court ruling on affirmative action and the legal and political pressure that followed, ERG budgets and dedicated staff were cut at many large employers while the groups' workload grew: recruitment support, retention, crisis response, product input. The groups that survived the squeeze did it by negotiating explicit charters. The ones that didn't burned out their volunteers.
Amjilt News publishes information, not legal or management advice.
What happened to ERGs in the retrenchment?
A predictable squeeze. Public DEI commitments made in 2020-2021 generated a wave of ERG formation — by mid-decade, most large US employers hosted multiple groups spanning women, racial and ethnic identities, veterans, disability, and caregiving. The post-2023 legal climate, shareholder proposals, and political pressure led many companies to retitle, restructure, or quietly defund central DEI offices. ERGs, being volunteer-run and cheap, mostly survived the formal cuts — but lost the staff liaisons, budget lines, and executive sponsorship that made them functional. Survey and consulting reporting through 2024-2025 documented the pattern: groups still existing on paper, operating on personal time.
Why is unpaid ERG labor the core problem?
Because the work was always real. A functioning ERG runs events, consults on policy, onboards members into networks, fields employee complaints that managers mishandle, and represents the company externally. Members — disproportionately women of color, per the composition of most ERG leadership — perform this on top of full jobs, usually without compensation, promotion credit, or workload adjustment. Labor researchers and workplace-equity advocates documented the pattern for years: career benefit accrues inconsistently while the burnout cost is reliable. The retrenchment made the unfairness structural: same work, fewer resources, more risk.
What did the better-designed charters fix?
Four specifics, visible across the companies that reset their programs rather than cutting them. Compensation: ERG leadership roles recognized with stipends, bonus weight, or explicit workload reduction — the practice consulting firms' 2025 guidance increasingly recommended. Scope: a written list of what the group does and, crucially, does not do — not a substitute for HR, legal, or crisis communications. Data: agendas tied to retention and recruitment metrics the company already tracks, which converts the group from a cost center into an instrument. And sponsorship with teeth: an executive whose compensation review mentions the group's outcomes, not a name on a slide.
What about the legal chill?
Real but narrower than the rhetoric. Following the 2023 Students for Fair Admissions decision and subsequent state legislation, employment lawyers advising companies drew a distinction consistently through 2024-2025: discriminatory decision-making is exposure; voluntary affinity groups, open membership, and inclusion programming generally are not — with public employers facing tighter constraints in some states than private ones. Companies that folded ERGs entirely were usually responding to perceived political risk rather than specific legal advice; companies that kept them adjusted names, membership openness, and formal ties to business functions. Both responses are documented; only one kept the institutional knowledge.
What's the honest argument for keeping ERGs at all?
The recruitment and retention data, and the network-formation argument. Employees in well-run ERGs report stronger belonging and intent-to-stay in engagement research; belonging predicts retention about as reliably as manager relationship does. And ERGs solve an onboarding-network problem that hybrid work made worse — they are, functionally, the institution that manufactures workplace friendships at scale for people the default networks miss. Companies cutting them during a friendship recession and an engagement slump are optimizing a quarterly line against a durable capability. That's not a values argument. It's a pipeline argument, which is presumably why the groups that got charters kept their budgets.
FAQ
Are employee resource groups still common?
Yes — most large US employers still operate them. The 2023-2025 retrenchment cut budgets, staff liaisons, and in some cases names, more often than the groups themselves.
Do ERG leaders get paid?
Usually not, which is the core fairness problem. The better-designed programs recognize the role with stipends, bonus weight, or workload reduction, per consulting guidance published through 2025.
For more context, read Mandatory fun finally met its match: everyone's calendar.
For more context, read employee perks trends 2026.
For more context, read Onboarding quietly became the highest-ROI culture project.